![artmatic eyelashes 518 c artmatic eyelashes 518 c](https://sc01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1XZxRNVXXXXbhXXXXq6xXFXXX5/200146636/HTB1XZxRNVXXXXbhXXXXq6xXFXXX5.jpg)
On July 15, 1994, Max Factor and *853 Noxell answered the complaint and counter-claimed for similar relief. On June 22, 1994, Maybelline answered the complaint and counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that its products were non-infringing and that the patents in suit were invalid. A stipulation and order dated Jextended the time for defendants Max Factor and Noxell to answer to July 16, 1994.
![artmatic eyelashes 518 c artmatic eyelashes 518 c](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/9b826cea-0b33-4d85-ad1f-8b5fb4469099.f518a8f3664c71176a2e6a3f98274924.jpeg)
On April 18, 1994, Artmatic filed a complaint against Max Factor, Noxell, Maybelline, and others alleging patent infringement of a design for a cosmetics compact. For purposes of these motions, the relevant facts are as follows. This is a multi-party patent infringement suit. For the reasons below, Artmatic's motion to modify the default judgments is denied and Maybelline's motion for summary judgment is denied. ("Maybelline") for summary judgment based on the collateral estoppel effect of the default judgments secured by Max Factor and Noxell. This multi-defendant action for patent infringement is before the Court on two motions: (1) a motion by plaintiffs Artmatic USA Cosmetics and Arthur Matney ("Artmatic") to modify the default judgment entered against them on Octoby eliminating a declaration of patent invalidity and (2) a motion by defendant Maybelline Co. Laura Weiss, Fenster & Weiss, New City, New York, for Defendant Pavion Ltd.Īllen Winston, Winston & Winston, Rye, New York, for Defendants Zalan. Snyder, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Defendants Noxell Corp. Susan Robertson, Kirchstein, Ottinger, Israel & Schiffmiller, P.C., New York City, for Dell Laboratories, Inc. Katz, Cooper & Dunham L.L.P., New York City, for Plaintiffs Artmatic USA Cosmetics and Arthur Matney. Hauser, Walter, Conston, Alexander & Green, P.C., New York City, for Defendant Maybelline Co. Delahunty, Brooks, Haidt, Haffner & Delahunty, New York City, for Defendants Noxell Corp. MAYBELLINE CO., a DIVISION OF SCHERING PLOUGH, INC., Paris Presents, Inc., a division of Allied of Chicago, Inc., Noxell Corporation, Bonne-Bell, Inc., Almay Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Revlon Corp., Max Factor, Coty Division of Pfizer Inc., Pavion Ltd., Cosmetics & Chemical Manufacturers, Inc., Cosmair, Inc., Chesebrough Ponds, Inc., Dell Laboratories, Inc., Estee Lauder, Inc., Posner Labs, Inc., and Zalan Products Inc., Defendants.
![artmatic eyelashes 518 c artmatic eyelashes 518 c](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8fb518_bccd69283264421b8422f2e918dd63ce~mv2.png)
Pre-Trimmed, Pre-Feathered & Self-AdhesiveĪrtmatic False Eyelashes Cliss are amazing self-adhesive eyelashes that can be easily applied to the eyelash base.